Search this site

Why speed without accuracy puts nutrition, claims, and margins at risk Speed matters - but not at the cost of accuracy. Nutrition panels and costings are often done manually, and that creates risk: wrong nutrition declaration incorrect salt/sugar claims margin surprises last-minute reformulation panic This can be raised by: · Retailer technical teams (nutrition accuracy + claims) · BRCGS / IFS auditors (product information control) · Regulatory scrutiny if nutrition/claims are challenged Example: Marketing wants “high protein”. But the recipe changes and now it no longer qualifies - yet the claim stays on pack. Click-PLM helps by automating nutrition and costing calculations from live ingredient data and rules. #Nutrition #FoodCosting #PLM

Every copy is a chance for error Duplicate data entry isn’t just inefficient - it’s a quality risk. Because every time data is copied, you create a chance for: typos mismatched specs outdated versions conflicting documents This can be exposed by: · BRCGS / IFS audits (consistency and control) · Retailer audits (cross-checking pack copy vs spec vs ingredient list) · Internal QA reviews when investigating issues Example: Procurement has one ingredient spec. Technical has another. The label has a third. That’s how errors slip through. Click-PLM helps by linking data across teams and ensuring changes flow through the system properly. #OperationalEfficiency #DataIntegrity #PLM

Why true compliance comes from control, not spreadsheets Compliance isn’t a spreadsheet problem Most compliance processes still live in: spreadsheets emails disconnected systems And it works… until it doesn’t. Version confusionMissing dataLast-minute fire drills Compliance isn’t just about storing data.It’s about controlling it. With Click-PLM: one source of truth structured product data built-in workflows and approvals Because compliance shouldn’t depend on:>who updated the file>which version is right>where it’s saved It should just be… there. How many versions of your “final” spreadsheet exist right now?

Why audit readiness depends on traceability - not memory Audits shouldn’t rely on memory Auditor:“ Can you walk me through what changed?” Most teams: >“I think…” >“It should be in here somewhere…” >“Let me check with someone…” That’s not audit readiness. That’s risk. In food & FMCG, every product decision needs a clear, traceable history. Not guesswork. Not memory. With the right PLM: every change is recorded every decision is traceable every answer is accessible Because in an audit, “I think” isn’t good enough. How confident are you in your product history today?

Why uncontrolled product data creates real compliance, safety, and audit risk If product data lives in emails, spreadsheets, and shared drives, you don’t have control - you have hope. That’s fine… until someone asks: · “Which spec is current?” · “Which allergen statement was approved?” · “Why is the label copy different to the spec?” This is the kind of thing that can come up during: · BRCGS / IFS audits (document control + product specification management) · Retailer/customer technical audits (they’ll compare what you say vs what you supply) · FSA / Local Authority inspections if there’s a complaint or incident and they request evidence. Real-world example: A product is made using a recipe that was “nearly final” but not approved, meaning: · allergen risk changes · nutrition changes · legal name or QUID may no longer be correct · shelf-life assumptions may be wrong PLM helps by creating a single source of truth with version control and controlled access. One product record. One live spec. One approved label. No confusion. #PLM #FoodSafety #SpecificationManagement #AuditReadiness

Why product launches fail when control doesn’t keep up with creativity NPD is where good intentions go to die 😅 Because it involves technical, NPD, procurement, QA, operations, packaging, marketing, and customers. Auditors don’t “audit creativity”- they audit control. This comes up in: · Retailer launch readiness audits · BRCGS / IFS audits (product development + validation expectations) · FSSC 22000 (risk management and system integrity) Example: A product launches before: shelf life validation is complete label is signed off allergen cleaning validation is confirmed supplier approval is finalised That’s how launches turn into firefighting. Click-PLM helps by managing stage-gates, sign-offs, and readiness checks so launches are controlled, not chaotic. #NPD #FoodInnovation #PLM

Why poor document control is one of the most common audit failures A lot of audit non-conformances aren’t about “unsafe food”. They’re about weak control. Missing documents, outdated specs, incomplete records, unclear responsibilities - these all signal that food safety might not be managed consistently. This can come up with: · BRCGS / IFS audits (document control is a core expectation) · Customer/retailer audits (they’ll ask for specific evidence on the spot) · FSA / Local Authority inspections (especially after a complaint, food poisoning allegation, or allergen incident) Example: An auditor asks for: current finished product spec allergen matrix latest label approval supplier approval status most recent micro results …and it takes 2 hours and 4 people to find them. That’s not a great day. Click-PLM helps by standardising documentation and ensuring required fields, reviews, and approvals are built into the process - not reliant on memory. #AuditReady #FoodSafetyCulture #PLM

"Accelerating product development and delivery with Click-PLM’s streamlined solutions for rapid time to market" At Click-PLM, we empower your teams to accelerate time to market by streamlining every stage of the product development lifecycle. Our PLM solutions enable real-time collaboration, seamless integration across departments, and instant access to accurate product data, ensuring that critical decisions are made quickly and efficiently. By optimising workflows, improving communication, and reducing bottlenecks, Click-PLM helps you bring innovative products to market faster, while maintaining quality and meeting customer expectations. With Click-PLM, you can shorten development cycles, improve responsiveness, and stay ahead of the competition.

Why weak supplier control is a major audit and compliance risk Supplier control is no longer “nice to have”. It’s one of the first places auditors go when there’s a product issue. Why? Because a site can look perfect… but a single weak supplier can undo everything. This can be raised by: · BRCGS / IFS audits (supplier approval, specs, risk assessment) · Retailer audits (they may ask for vulnerability assessments / fraud controls) · FSA inspections if product authenticity or safety is questioned Example: A supplier updates a spec (new oil, new processing aid, new allergen warning) …but it’s sent as a PDF and sits unread in someone’s inbox. Now your “approved” product spec is wrong - and your label might be wrong too. Click-PLM helps by keeping supplier specs structured, current, and linked to finished products - with review cycles and alerts. #SupplierApproval #FoodFraud #PLM

"Streamlining every stage with Click-PLM’s seamless and efficient lifecycle management solutions" Managing the product lifecycle (PLM) requires a comprehensive strategy that ensures every phase of a product's journey is well-coordinated and efficient. At Click-PLM, we help organisations centralise product data, streamline processes, and enhance collaboration across all teams. Click-PLM monitors each task performed and notifies the next team when it's their turn to take action. Notifications are delivered via emails, PDFs, in-software task lists and even text messages if you prefer. By leveraging advanced PLM tools, we enable seamless management of product information, track changes, and ensure compliance across various stages of the lifecycle. Our solutions provide real-time visibility, ensuring teams make data-driven decisions and minimize errors. With Click-PLM, you can drive faster innovation, reduce time to market, and maintain full traceability of every product iteration. We are constantly working to utilise new technologies with one goal in mind - Faster, Safer Product launches.

Because what’s legal in one market can be illegal in another Food compliance isn’t static. Rules vary by: country retailer category claim type ingredient origin packaging format This can be raised by: · FSA / Local Authority inspections (legal compliance) · Retailer technical audits (their standards often exceed legal minimum) · Certification audits where compliance frameworks are tested Example: A product is fine in one market but non-compliant in another due to: different allergen labelling rules claim thresholds additive declarations language requirements Click-PLM helps with rule-based checks and market-specific outputs, reducing the chance of accidental non-compliance. #Regulatory #FoodLabelling #PLM

Why label control is one of the biggest compliance risks in food Artwork is one of the highest-risk parts of the process because it’s where: legal compliance allergens claims nutrition traceability codes …all become customer-facing. This is flagged by: · Retailer audits (label accuracy and approval processes) · BRCGS / IFS audits (label control + packaging management) · FSA / Local Authority if mislabelling leads to a complaint or recall Example: A label is printed with the old ingredient list after a recipe change. The product might be safe - but it’s now illegal and potentially a recall. Click-PLM helps with controlled artwork versioning, approval workflows, and linking label text to the data source - reducing human error. #ArtworkManagement #FoodLabelling #PLM